Which of the following is NOT considered a step in assessing organizational uncertainties?

Recognizing that ignoring perceived uncertainties is not a valid step in assessing organizational uncertainties is key to effective strategic planning and risk management. In a comprehensive analysis, it is crucial for organizations to acknowledge all uncertainties, including those that may seem trivial or improbable. Dismissing perceived uncertainties could lead to a significant oversight that impacts decision-making and overall organizational resilience.

In contrast, the other listed steps—identifying macro uncertainties, understanding individual biases, and changing organizational systems to facilitate success—are all critical components of a thorough assessment. Identifying macro uncertainties involves examining broader external factors that could impact the organization. Understanding individual biases is vital for ensuring that assessments are not skewed by personal perspectives or assumptions. Adjusting organizational systems to facilitate success speaks to the need for aligning structures and processes with identified uncertainties, enhancing the organization's adaptability and response strategies.

Overall, the emphasis on not ignoring perceived uncertainties is fundamental in cultivating a proactive and informed approach to organizational challenges.